The Reality of Manual Underwriting: Lost Time and Hidden Errors

Manual underwriting is the foundation on which most real estate firms build their processes - decades of tradition, lots of experienced eyes, plenty of spreadsheets. But let's talk honestly: it's slow, it's error-prone, and in today's market, it's costing you deals.

Traditional commercial underwriting typically takes several days to several weeks. Analysts begin by collecting documents -rent rolls, operating statements, leases, tax returns, and financial statements. Each property generates hundreds of pages. Underwriters manually extract data, plug it into Excel models, validate assumptions, and run scenarios. Every step introduces friction.

The data entry alone is brutal. Rent rolls come as PDFs. Operating statements arrive as images. Leases are scattered across email. Someone must manually enter every data point into a spreadsheet. Typos happen. Formulas break. Entire columns get accidentally deleted. A Cambridge study comparing machine-underwritten loans to human-underwritten loans found that machine-underwritten loans had a 6.8% lower default rate - a meaningful gap driven by precision that humans cannot match at scale [1].

Worse, spreadsheet errors in real estate carry enormous consequences. Fannie Mae once had to revise its balance sheet by $1.1 billion due to a spreadsheet formula error [2]. JP Morgan's Value at Risk model lost the firm $6 billion due to manual copy-and-paste errors across spreadsheets [2]. TransAlta, a Canadian power company, incurred $24 million in losses due to a single spreadsheet error [2]. These aren't anomalies—they're warnings about what happens when financial models depend on manual processes.

In commercial real estate underwriting, even minor errors compound. An off-by-one vacancy assumption can make a deal appear profitable but not be. A misplaced decimal in rent growth becomes a 30-year liability. An underwriter who's tired after reviewing 15 deals that day misses a lease renewal trigger that kills cash flow projections.

The AI Underwriting Revolution: Minutes Instead of Days

Enter AI underwriting software. These platforms automate the entire workflow: data extraction, financial analysis, risk assessment, and report generation. Instead of days, the process takes minutes.

Here's what that looks like in practice. When IntellCRE built their AI underwriting platform, they measured speed gains: financial data uploads in 2 seconds and all metrics calculated in 3 seconds [4]. Inaza reported that insurance underwriting—a similar process—can now be completed in under 60 seconds, down from several days [5]. That's 90% faster [5].

But speed without accuracy is recklessness. AI-powered underwriting delivers both.

How AI Underwriting Gets Accuracy Right

The accuracy gains come from three sources: consistency, comprehensiveness, and pattern detection that humans can't match.

Consistency first. Every deal runs through the same logic. Every assumption gets validated against the same rules. There's no "underwriter A's method" versus "underwriter B's method"—just standardized, repeatable analysis. This eliminates the 23–28% performance gap between human underwriters [3].

Comprehensiveness second. AI systems integrate multiple data sources simultaneously. They extract data from PDFs, spreadsheets, emails, and documents. They cross-reference lease terms, tenant history, and market comparables in seconds. A human underwriter reviewing 500+ pages might miss a buried assumption; an AI system flags everything.

Pattern detection third. AI systems learn from massive historical datasets. They identify correlations between market conditions, property types, tenant profiles, and outcomes. A study found that AI-driven risk assessment reduced mortgage default rates by 27% compared with manual analysis [6]. Another study showed that AI-powered risk models reduce default rates by up to 25% [7]. These aren't marginal improvements—they're the difference between a profitable portfolio and a troubled one.

Deloitte's CRE Transformation Findings

Deloitte surveyed commercial real estate owners across multiple markets and found that firms implementing AI-driven underwriting see dramatic improvements:

• A major retailer deployed autonomous HVAC optimization across 600+ properties and saved $1.38 million annually, plus 7.98 million kWh in electricity costs [8]

• QuadReal Property Group, managing a 10,000-unit portfolio, implemented AI-powered leasing agents and saw tour-to-lease conversions increase by 33%, plus shortened vacancy periods [8]

• Over 50% of commercial real estate firms plan to invest in AI-based underwriting tools within two years [9]

These aren't projections. They're real outcomes from firms that already moved.

Replacing Excel: The Systemic Shift

Many firms ask: can we just build a better Excel model? The answer is no—and here's why.

Excel is a tool for static analysis. Underwriting is a process requiring dynamic integration, real-time data validation, cross-system updates, and audit trails. When you rely on Excel for real estate underwriting, you're fighting spreadsheet's limitations:

• Hard to track versions across teams [13]

• Difficult to integrate live market data [14]

• No built-in validation for common underwriting errors [14]

• Impossible to scale without manual effort duplication [14]

AI underwriting software that's designed to replace Excel for real estate underwriting connects to data sources, validates inputs automatically, generates standardized reports, and creates audit trails that satisfy regulators. Excel can't do any of that without custom code and constant maintenance.

The firms winning in today's market aren't the ones with the best Excel skills. They're the ones who replaced Excel for real estate underwriting with platforms designed for underwriting[14].

What About Human Judgment?

Here's a common misconception: AI underwriting eliminates underwriters. It doesn't. It changes what they do.

AI automates the mechanical work—data extraction, formula calculation, standardized risk scoring. Underwriters then focus on what they do best: complex analysis, relationship building, exception handling, and strategic decision-making. An experienced underwriter reviewing an AI-generated risk summary takes 10 minutes. That same underwriter manually extracting data and building models from scratch takes 8 hours. The difference is leverage.

The best AI underwriting systems use a human-in-the-loop approach. AI flags anomalies. Underwriters validate assumptions. Together, they make better decisions faster than either could alone.

The Bottom Line

Manual underwriting took the industry far. Experienced underwriters, careful analysis, and detailed spreadsheets built real estate finance as we know it. But the world changed. Markets move faster. Data is abundant. Complexity increased. The tools built for 1990s workflows can't match modern demands.

AI underwriting is faster - minutes versus days. It's more accurate - 27% lower default rates, 6.8% better performance than manual analysis. It scales without proportional cost increases. It removes the inconsistency that plagues manual processes. And it's here. Over half the industry is moving now.

Firms that automate real estate underwriting close more deals, win more opportunities, reduce risk, and improve margins. Firms that don't will increasingly compete at a disadvantage.

The future of underwriting isn't manual analysis supported by AI. It's AI analysis validated by human judgment. The firms that make that shift first will be the ones winning in the markets ahead.

© 2025 MultiVest Engine Blog — Educational content for modern real estate investors.